Pro & Con
Here's the case for and here's the case against.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
"As much as I hate to say it, I know beyond a doubt that the next weeks are going to be nasty. He’s leading, and there are people who simply cannot stomach the idea of his beautiful family living in the White House. There will be smears, all sorts of slander and lies, the likes of which you’ve probably rarely seen. So y’all, we got to pray for this man. And please . . . make sure you VOTE!" (Miryam Ehrlich Williamson)
Pundit of the Month
The (Evolving!) Rules
This is an experiment. Contributors are invited to post brief current items of their own interest. Items will be edited to ensure brevity, taste, interest, etc. Read More.
2 comments:
The case for ticket-balancing! Right on!
Maybe, but this information concerns me:
Governor Kathleen Sebelius REPEATEDLY REFUSED TO PROVIDE ANY
RESPONSES TO CITIZENS ON ISSUES THROUGH THE 2006
NATIONAL POLITICAL AWARENESS TEST WHEN ASKED TO DO SO BY Key national leaders of both major parties including:
John McCain, Republican Senator
Geraldine Ferraro, Former Democratic Congresswoman
Michael Dukakis, Former Democratic Governor
Bill Frenzel, Former Republican Congressman
Richard Kimball, Project Vote Smart President
Over 100 news organizations throughout the nation also urged their candidates to supply their issue positions through the National Political Awareness Test.
Any more info, lte?
Post a Comment